|
|
|

|
The Peasant Reform of 1861 has been a widely debated topic
in the history of Russia as it can be seen as having
repercussions on not only Russia but also world-wide. At the
same time as the emancipation decree, American slavery was
abolished, but it was the Russian move that has been seen as
most successful. |
|
 |
The Peasant
Reform has been described as one of the greatest turning points of
Russian history and a great achievement in terms of the
modernisation of Russia, however it has also been suggested that it
was one of the greatest mistakes ever made. In order to examine the
political, social and economic consequences of the Peasant Reform it
is of vital importance to look at what the emancipation statute
consisted of. It is also vital to look at how different sectors of
society interpreted the purpose of the reform. A contextual analysis
of Russia in the pre-emancipation period will also have to be
examined so that it can be seen why the Peasant Reform was seen as a
necessity. |
|
To illustrate this
essay, we have used the images of peasant Russia left to us by
S. M. Prokudin-Gorsky |
|
The decree published on 19th
February 1861 stated, ‘The serfdom of peasants settled on estate
owners’ landed properties, and household serfs, is abolished
forever.’ The basic principle of the reform was that it gave the
peasants their freedom from the landlords and, in theory, allowed
them to farm their own sections of land and then sell produce at
local markets for profit. The reform also allowed the serfs to break
free of the social barriers that they had been dictated by for
years. The serfs were now allowed to marry whom they pleased,
without needing permission and they no longer had to be answerable
to the landlords.
However, as will be argued during this essay, were
all these promises upheld and did the peasants gain the true freedom
that they wanted? Although there was this, more positive, side to
the reform, the other side was that the land given to the peasants
was given on a collective, not individual basis and the peasantry
was still subject to army conscription, paying of taxes and
different judicial rules than the rest of the empire. Redemption
payments were also to be paid by the peasantry, over a period of
forty-nine years, with interest. If the peasant died within this
forty-nine year period, then the debt that was still left to be paid
off was passed onto their next of kin. In part, these redemption
payments were a compensation for the landlords for the loss of
labour and land.
Copyrighted
material
|
|
|
|