All Russias Home Tsarist Russia Soviet Russia Russian Federation Learn Russian Images & Video
        A L L R U S S I A S . C O M
Russia from A to Z Russia on YouTube Best Student Essays Jokes about Rulers Russia with Laugh Useful Links

 
 

Political Jokes

Russian Music Samples

When Putin Retires...

 

The Structural Approach

 

A third, structural, approach to explaining the lack of party development devotes attention to the scale of socio-economic transformation in Russia. This school attributes the lack of party development in Russia to poorly defined socio-economic cleavages in Russian society.  

Post-communist transformations destroy old classes, create new interest groups, and confuse almost everyone living through the transition. The slow development of capitalism in Russia suggests that we should expect a similarly slow formation of market-based interest groups. Russian parties, in turn, have had difficulty in situating themselves on programmatic or interest-based dimensions. For instance, Russia has weak liberal parties, because Russia has a small and ill-defined middle class.

The Triumphal March of Capitalists in Russia. Poster: budaev.ru

Under these circumstances, interest cleavages in the 1990s were fashioned more by general attitudes about the transition, rather than by particular economic or even ethnic concerns. In the 1990s political situations and electoral choices were often polarized into two camps, those for change and those against. More conventional cleavages that demarcate the contours of stable party systems in other countries may perhaps emerge only now that this polarization has begun to recede. This approach offers important insights about party weakness in Russia and predicts that party development will occur from the bottom-up.

Still others believe that the long shadow of an authoritarian past and an unstructured post-Soviet society cannot be blamed entirely for the lack of party development in Russia today. They emphasize a causal relationship between individual choice and party development. Specifically, Russian political elites made choices about the timing of elections, the kind of electoral systems, and the relationship between the president and parliament at the federal level and the relationship among the heads of administration of local legislatures at the regional level, all of which have impeded party development.

In other words, parties in Russia are weak because the most powerful politicians in Russia have made choices to make them weak. Cultural, historical, and socio-economic factors play a role in impeding party development, but individual decisions especially decisions about institutional design are the more salient causes of poor party development.

 PREVIOUS  NEXT
 
Copyrighted material
We Are Partners
 
Bookmark This Site ││Site Map ││Send Feedback ││About This Site
Lecture Bullet Points
Copyright 2007-2017 Alex Chubarov All Rights Reserved

 
 

First & Second Dumas

Learn Russian with Us

Russian Federation

The "Catching up" Cycles
"Non-organic" Reforms
Great Leap to Capitalism
Russia's Privatization
Deformed Capitalism
Coping with Transition
The Yeltsin Era
Yeltsin's Legacy
Putin's Plan
Russian Federalism
The Chechen Problem
"Deprivatizing" the State
First and Second Dumas
Third and Fourth Dumas
Civil Society
"Controlled" Democracy

Post-Soviet Geopolitics

Paradoxes of Russian Mentality
Economy under Putin
The Putinite Order
Putin's Choice
People Speak (Opinion Polls)
Tables and Statistics
Maps
Links

Russia from A to Z

Images & Video