The Revolutionary Masses
 |
The part
played by Vladimir Ulianov (Lenin) in determining Russia’s destiny
in the twentieth century is a remarkable demonstration of the role
of personality in historical events. He was born in 1870 in an
intellectual family - his father was a school inspector in a town on
the Volga named Simbirsk, now Ulianovsk. |
A striking parallel exists
between Lenin’s and Nicholas II’s early periods of life: both
experienced a tragic bereavement in the family. Whereas for Nicholas
the assassination of his grandfather must have been one of the most
lasting memories of childhood, Lenin was greatly influenced by the
death of his eldest brother in 1887, who was executed for
participating in a plot to assassinate Alexander III. At the time of
his execution Vladimir was only 17. He greatly admired his brother,
and his death has sometimes been considered a turning point for
Lenin, who became a radical early on.
He soon
found an ideological base for his radicalism in Marxism, quickly
rising to the role of the leader in the ‘League of Struggle for the
Emancipation of the Working-Class’, an underground Marxist
organization, established in St. Petersburg in 1895. In 1896 he
suffered imprisonment for his illegal activities and was exiled to
Siberia for the three years following. While in exile, he produced a
massive work called The Development of Capitalism in Russia
whose main contention was to prove that Russia was, indeed, becoming
a capitalist nation. In 1900 he left Siberia and traveled abroad
where he participated, together with
George
Plekhanov, in the publication of
a Social-Democratic newspaper, The Spark, and in other
revolutionary activities, often under the pseudonym of Lenin. At
first awed by the ‘father of Russian Marxism’, Plekhanov, Lenin
quickly rose to positions of leadership in a newly created
Social-Democratic Party in which he led the extremist Bolshevik wing
from 1903. Before long he became one of the most important Marxist
theoreticians in Russia.
Lenin’s
theoretical contribution to Marxism could in no sense rival the
contributions of the two German originators of the doctrine. He
strove to adapt Marxism to the changing conditions in the world and
to Russian circumstances, and he produced certain important
additions to and modifications of the basic teaching. The need for
some of these arose from the fact that Marx had analyzed the
contemporary capitalist society and predicted that, as a result of a
proletarian revolution, it would be replaced by a communist society,
but he had little to say of a concrete nature about how the
post-revolutionary society would be run, or indeed, about how the
revolution itself should be organized and guided. Lenin, on the
other hand, in his long career as an exiled revolutionary, wrote at
length on the conduct of the revolution and on society in the
immediate postrevolution phase.